![]() ![]() So would Reaktor be a better option than Pure Data for generative patterns and sound design? I mean I’m gonna learn the two anyway but would Reaktor give closer results to these kind of sounds than Pure Data or are they both viable?Īlso I can’t seem to find any good info on how to design sounds like these. So that sucks Which leaves me working mostly on my laptop. But modular it’s just so pricey, and to be honest I’m not in the kind of position to set up a modular system cause I move around a lot for work and stuff so I can’t come home every evening to my house and play a modular setup. Yeah I’ve seen a lot of Richard Devine’s instagram videos with all his modular systems setups, and the stuff you can do is mental. The only thing is I kind of suck at math so I dunno how I’m gonna fair out with creating complex patches like the one in that first video above, practice, practice!!! Also I bought that book so it’d be a waste not to try it out… ![]() I figure if I can learn PD, then Reaktor afterwards would be a piece of cake, and Max/MSP as well. I actually have Reaktor I got it a while ago but I never got round to learning it, crazy work schedule and all that didn’t allow me time, but I have some free time now and I figured I’d learn Pure Data first as it’d be a good overall learning experience to start with. ![]() I particularly like the idea of generative rhythms because after spending the last 3 years with Renoise basically typing out the patterns manually I’m a little tired of it and want to do something new that will give faster results and some unexpected ones to. I’m planning on making sounds and generative composition within PD and then exporting them out as stems to mangle further with glitch & granular plugins, although I suppose if I get good enough I could create these type of mangling and granular system inside Pure Data. I don’t use anything but Renoise currently so I wouldn’t worry about integrating it with a DAW at all, purely stand-alone. Just as a reference here’s a few examples of the type of music I’m aiming at creating: How good is it for creating generative music i.e complex poly & euclidean rhythms and melody, is it good for making crazy dsp mangling effects with it, or is it all just a bit overhyped?Īlso I’m aware that Autechre and Devine use Max/MSP more so than PD, but I’m not forking out money for that straight away when I can practice on PD for free. So I’m curious as to just how applicable it is in terms of sound creation and generative music. But I know artists like Autechre, & Richard Devine have used it. I’ve searched online and looked at videos but never seen anything that crazy in terms of sound design coming from Pure Data. I’ve tried PD before but only ever managed to make useless sounds on it that any subtractive synth could make and a couple of crappy noise snares, but my knowledge of the program at the time was pretty much entry level. I bought Andy Farnell’s book Designing Sound with the intention of using it to learn Pure Data for sound design and generative music purposes, and was wondering if anyone has any experience with the book and using Pure Data for these two things? ![]() This really should be aimed at the Pure Data forum but I haven’t made an account on there yet so I’m just gonna aim it here for now… Meant to put it in Off Topic, not Ideas & Suggestions. Edit: Put this topic in the wrong location. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |